Maktabah Al-Imām Al-Ghazālī

  1. When they closed the Masajid, despite being begged not to do so, there was no call for unity. 2. When they spied on Musallis, there was no call for unity. 3. When they signed the Global Imams Charter, they united with the Christians and Zionists and Buddhists, but there was no call for unity with the Muslim Ummah. 4. When they labelled the Sahabah radiyallahu 'anhum disparagingly, there was no call for unity. 5. When they called for unity with the Shia disbelievers and cast their brothers in a bad light, there was no call for unity. 6. When they labelled their own as controversial and problematic, there was no call for unity. 7. When they called the murderer and false prophet Khamenei "Imam", there was no unity with the Muslim Ummah 8. When they make horrible moves to modernise the Deen, they don't call for unity; rather, they push their distortions down the throats of others. 9. May the lies of accursed modernists and liberals follow them wherever they go. The s...

  Over the last few weeks, the Shia lovers, Shia sympathisers, and the unity crowd have been peddling deceptive propaganda and lies about the Shia disbelievers. The claim they make is: whatever is found in the Shia books is all old stuff, and the new and young Shia do not believe all these things anymore. Let us study this claim and see how much weight it really holds. Firstly, have these claims come from the highest Shia authorities in Iran, Iraq, and elsewhere? Or are these claims being peddled by local Shia lovers and Shia defenders for some ulterior motive, to guard something sinister? Secondly,  can the so-called new and young Shias urgently explain what is so new about themselves? Have they abandoned the 'Aqeedah of their forefathers? Then why do they still call themselves Shias or Twelvers? Thirdly, in what exactly are the so-called new and young Shias different from the old ones? If they have changed their 'Aqeedah for the better, i.e., they have embraced Islam, then t...

Shiasm is, in essence, built upon abuse and revilement; if cursing, condemnation, and vilification were removed from it, nothing substantial would remain. Under the name of tabarra (disavowal), this ill-fated sect engages in endless foul speech, and every major and minor Shi‘i book contains these things in great detail. Some people are acting shocked by the ranting of the Kuwaiti cleric Yasser al-Khabith, whereas in reality there is nothing surprising about it. The vulgarities he spews are not even a fraction of the disbelief and absurdities found in Shi‘i literature itself. The disagreement between people like Yasser al-Khabith and Hassan Allahyari and many within their own sect is precisely over this: how long should silence under the guise of taqiyyah (dissimulation) continue? If this is how we are described in the books, why hesitate to present it openly before people? And once they are free from the “expediency” of concealing their religion, you can clearly see how the true face o...

  The Shia are very quick to shout 'sectarian' when their reality is unveiled. However, if we think properly for a few moments, we understand that the Shia they are the real sectarians and the real people who create divisions and unnecessary strife. 1. If we look at the children of Sayyiduna Muhammad Rasulullah sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam, then the Shia refuse to accept the sons and three daughters of Rasulullah sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam. So, who is creating division and who is pulling people into their sect of Shia? 2. If we look at the wives of Sayyiduna Muhammad Rasulullah sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam, then the Shia do not accept them as Ahl-ul-Bayt and falsely accuse Sayyidah 'A'isha radiyallahu 'anha? So, who is creating division and sectarianism in the Ummah? 3. If we look at the Sahabah radiyallahu 'anhum. The Shia utter profanities towards them, write filth about them, and spread lies about them. So, who is creating division and who is se...

  The Shia are Persian Iranian Zoroastrians who sought to destroy Islam from within. They outwardly embraced it, transforming their rituals into Zoroastrian traditions in the name of Islam, thus tarnishing Islam with this disgrace and stabbing it in the back. The Shia praise and venerate only Sayyiduna Husayn [radiyallahu anhu], excluding the other sons of Sayyiduna Ali ibn Abi Talib [radiyallahu anhu]. Why? Have you ever asked yourself this question? Have you ever wondered about this? The answer is a fact that may shock you, many Muslims worldwide, and especially Arab Shia. Before answering this question, consider this information about the sons of Sayyiduna Ali ibn Abi Talib [radiyallahu anhu]: 1- Al-Hasan ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib 2- Al-Husayn ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib 3- Al-Muhsin ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib 4- Al-Abbas ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib 5- Hilal ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib 6- Abdullah ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib 7- Ja'far ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib 8- Uthman ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib 9- Ubaydullah ibn Ali i...

  Some Muslims are under the impression that to support Iran is acceptable because it is a Muslim country. This is incorrect.  The dominant strand of Shia in Iran today is the Ithna Ashariyyah. In fact, the constitution of Iran is based on Ithna Ashari Shiasm. Most, if not all, of the Shia in the world are the Ithna Ashariyyah. The beliefs of this group of the Shia constitute clear-cut disbelief which renders them out of the fold of Islam. It would be safer to say that they are enemies of Islam that work to destroy Islam. Consider three of their beliefs which are extremely problematic in Islam: 1. Imaamah:  Shia belief - Their 12 imams are sinless and have a status superior than that of the Ambiyaa 'alaihim-us-salaam. Their previous leader, Khomeini says, "One of the necessities of our doctrine is that our Imams have a status that neither a close angel nor a sent prophet can reach." Correct Islamic belief – The Ambiyaa are sinless and the best of Allah’s creation. Nabi sa...

The well-known interfaith advocate: Dudhwala, aka Haleebi, has made the following ridiculous statement on the mimbar: Reply: Contrary to his claims, Christmas is one of the most widely celebrated non-Muslim religious holidays in the world. Even if some people mark Christmas as just a secular festive season without believing in false Christian beliefs, Christmas still represents and still remains a symbol of Christianity and false Christian beliefs.  Hence, it is completely impermissible for Muslims to participate in Christmas in any way, including by greeting people for Christmas or giving gifts for Christmas.  Muslims should be encouraged to be courteous to their own non-hostile non-Muslim neighbours all year round, including by giving them gifts. But this must be within the boundaries of Islam. It cannot be by bending the principles and rules of Islam.  To improve the situation of Muslims in the UK or elsewhere, what is needed is to gain the assistance of Allah, Who alo...

  Under the Abrahamic Accords, there have been a large number of new concepts thrown in the faces of Muslims around the world. One of these is for the Muslims, Jews, and Christians to unite under the banner of a single forefather, i.e., Sayyiduna Ibrahim 'alayhi as-salaam. However, let us stop for a few moments and think over this claim.  The bond of the sons of Sayyiduna Ibrahim 'alayhi as-salaam has been negated by time. It does not exist today because the descendants of Sayyiduna Ibrahim 'alayhi as-salaam and his offspring have mixed with other peoples through marriage, social intercourse, migration, and wars. Today, it is impossible to separate them from other peoples. Since the followers of the three religions can be found among all peoples and tribes of the world, they have mixed on the basis of religion and not on the basis of ethnicity.  Therefore, applying the claim regarding the sons of Sayyiduna Ibrahim 'alayhi as-salaam on the Muslims, Jews, and Christians a...

  Who are the Ghanadiqah? Zanadiqah  (heretics) who do not like how Sayyiduna Muhammad Rasulullah sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam is described in history and the Seerah with the qualities of 'izzah (honour), ghayrah (protectiveness), quwwah (strength), and muru'ah (chivalry). So, they recreate his image in the image of Gandhi; a process known as the 'Gandhification of the Messenger'. They only accept those facets and characteristics of Islamic resistance to oppression that match the methodology of Gandhi; while everything else that contradicts Gandhi, they reinterpret (make ta'weel), outright deny (ta'teel), or say that they no longer apply today (mansukh). They are infamous for their inferiority complex, and feeling that the Islamic shari'ah and conquest history is backwards. The ideology of the Ghanadiqah is widespread amongst the masses of the Ummah and is one of the biggest obstacles towards Islamic revival.