Maktabah Al-Imām Al-Ghazālī

  [Shaykh-ul-Ḥadīth Mawlānā Yūsuf Motala raḥimahullāh was the Khalīfah of Quṭb-ul-Aqṭāb Shaykh-ul-Ḥadīth Mawlānā Muḥammad Zakariyya raḥimahullāh] Ḥaḍrat Mawlānā raḥimahullāh said, “As I had mentioned, there is goodness in this. If a person wavers slightly, then is gone. Īmān can slip from his grasp. For this reason, as I had mentioned that day, day before yesterday, that ‘Allāmah Dhahabī and ibn Taymiyyah were contemporaries. ‘Allāmah Dhahabī saw the ups and downs of ibn Taymiyyah, but he had his gaze on the solitary opinions of ibn Taymiyyah (tafarrudāt). He attested to the high knowledge of ibn Taymiyyah, and he even wrote in praise of him. However, they were contemporaries, companions, they were in one time. They had a link or relationship with each other. He (Dhahabī) knew and understood that he (ibn Taymiyyah) slipped in a certain ruling, he denied a certain matter, he criticised a certain matter, so he did not allow it to pass, he wrote a letter to him. Ibn Shuhbah tran...

Click on the Above to Listen to the Audio Muftī Aḥmad Khānpūrī damat barakatuhum mentions in a response to one of the questions asked to him: Questioner: "These days people have started doing programs where men and women are seated in the same hall without a separation in between, and this is justified in the name of Da'wah. Even in some religious institutions and madaris, men and women now sit in the same room, with a barrier between them but with the instructor facing both. The people who do this say that people will stop coming if there is more proper gender separation, and they justify this by saying that this kind of set up does not fall under the prohibition of free mixing." Muftī Aḥmad Khānpūrī  damat barakatuhum answers:  "People like this will not be able to serve the Deen. People who have this kind of attitude that they can interpret things as they wish will end up disfiguring the Deen rather than serve it in any way. There is nothing really that can be sai...

  Mufti Muhammad In'am al-Haqq Qasimi:  The Ithna 'Ashariyyah Shia (Twelvers) are out of the fold of Islam; they are Murtad (renegades) or Kafir (disbelievers). This is because of their belief of Tahreef-e-Qur'an, infallibility of the Imams, Taqiyyah (holy hypocrisy), Mut'ah (prostitution), and declaring the Sahabah radiyallahu 'anhum to be disbelievers and renegades - besides three of them. In fact, they are worse than the other disbelievers.  It is not permissible to give Zakat to a disbeliever or a renegade. Therefore, it is not permitted to give Zakat to a Shia.                                                          - Zakat ke Masa'il ka Encyclopedia p.286

  'In terms of their existence, Imaan and Disbelief (Kufr) do not accept any division; it cannot be that a person is 90% Muslim and 10% a disbeliever. If a slight amount of disbelief comes, then a person will be classified as fully out of the fold of Islam.'   - Hujjat-ul-Islam 'Allamah Khalid Mahmud rahimahullah  ['Aqidat-ul-A'lam fil Farq bayn al-Kufr wal Islam p.28] Note: When a Muslim cannot remain a Muslim if he has a slight belief entailing disbelief, so how can a person remain a Muslim if he accepts the Shia to be Muslims? This is especially so, when the Shia beliefs, from A to Z are filled with blasphemy and hypocrisy? Those who promote the Shia as Muslims cannot be true Muslims, because of the fact that they promote heresy and blasphemy as Islam!  How can any proper and genuine Muslim accept the heresy and blasphemy of the Shia religion to be Islam, and have the audacity and nerve to say 'the Shia are not so bad', 'the Shia don't believe suc...

  The enlightenment thinkers and rationalists, as they like to be called, or the obscurantists, as I prefer to call them, have had a significant negative impact on the minds of young people. Sometimes they talk to them about Darwin and morality, other times about the layers of the sky and the physics of the earth, and yet, at other times they go to such lengths in their discourse that they believe no one but themselves adheres to the correct understanding of religion.  Since the beginning of the Al-Aqsa Flood and the outbreak of confrontation between Muslims and Jews, we haven't heard the voices of Adnan Ibrahim, Al-Kayyali, or their followers. Aren't these among the most important issues facing the Ummah? We haven't heard their opinions on these major issues! This battle has revealed the joints of the Ummah. It has shown us the enemy from the friend. Many have remained silent like the grave in the face of the crimes and aggression perpetrated against a Muslim people with t...

Another rumour has been circulating: that the resistance is safe in the tunnels while the people are suffering and being persecuted. I heard some corrupt Shaykhs from outside Ghazza repeating this, and the Jewish media supported these rumours through cartoons, mockery, and misleading news...and how strange!  The Jews tell the resistance leadership: leave the tunnels and don't hide in them, for this is cowardice. And we say to them, using the same logic: remove the separation wall, stop the surveillance systems, and then fight us face to face, you cowards! Our trenches and tunnels are not cowardice, you cowards! The battlefields know our might, and your heavy tanks know their small size when our Mujahideen ride on them. Our tunnels are a tactic and an art of warfare that the nature of the battle and your cowardice have forced upon us from direct confrontation. I say this so that no one laughs at the Muslims and shakes their self-confidence! To be realistic, believe me, tunnels are n...

  To modern man - postmodern man: know that anything deviating from its course takes it from the realm of beauty into the absurdity of ugliness. The sun remains beautiful in its orbit ordained by Allah Ta'ala, and the moon remains luminous, sending forth its luminous tranquility by adhering to the limit set for it by Allah Ta'ala.  Likewise, everything in this world is subject to this, 'it is not for the sun to overtake the moon, nor does the night outpace the day. Each floats in its orbit.' [Qur'an 26:44] The greatest beauty for a servant is to adhere to the meaning of his servitude, for this is the requirement of reason and wisdom, especially for one who knows poverty and weakness, his limited understanding, and his weary thinking. Let him submit to the one who says to a thing, 'be', and it is. In all of this lies Shaytan's endless filth. Therefore, Allah Ta'ala has enjoined upon us not to worship Shaytan, but to dedicate our worship solely to Him,...

The Masajid are for Allah, so do not invoke with Allah anyone. [Surah al:Jinn 18] Masajid, not just Al-Masjid Al-Haraam! Allah-u-Akbar! What Masajid, O Rabb? There were only two Masajid on the earth (at the time of the revelation of this ayat); Al-Masjid Al-Haraam and Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa. Al-Masjid Al-Haraam was under the authority of the Quraysh, and Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa was under the rule of the Romans, and the Noble Qur'an says, 'O Muhammad, the Masajid are for Allah, all Masajid!' This is glad tidings from the heart of the critical Makkan situation that you will conquer Al-Masjid Al-Haraam and Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa, O Muhammad! How comforting was this to the heart of Rasulullah sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam! This is something Allah Ta'ala revealed to his Nabi, and Allah knows best. Source: Under the Banner of the Flood p.179 Support our Work Through Paypal

  Sayyiduna Anas bin Malik radiyallahu 'anhu reports that Rasulullah sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam said, "The most merciful of my Ummah upon my Ummah is Abu Bakr..." [Tirmidhi] Rasulullah sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam said that the system after himself will be that of Khilafat, and he indicated in multiple ways that Sayyiduna Abu Bakr As-Siddiq radhiyallahu 'anhu will be his first Khalifah. Moreover, he clearly said in the narration quoted above that Sayyiduna Abu Bakr As-Siddiq radhiyallahu 'anhu is the most merciful of the Ummah upon the Ummah. Now, who shows mercy? The elder upon the junior, or, the junior to the senior? Does the shepherd show mercy to the herd, or, does the herd show mercy to the shepherd? Does the father show mercy to the child, or, does the child show mercy to the father?  It is quite clear that the senior shows mercy to the junior. The father shows mercy to the children. The shepherd shows mercy to the herd. The superior shows mercy t...