Maktabah Al-Imām Al-Ghazālī

  Question: Nowadays, a question is raised with great fervour, that Shias are infidels, but is it correct to call all the Shias infidels? And this question is raised because some of our great scholars had put restrictions and clauses in their fatwas... that if a Shia holds this belief or this belief... etc. Answer: Remember, fatwas are given because of belief and ideology, so the focus of the fatwa is not on the word Shia, but on belief and ideology. Therefore, a person whose belief is kufr (blasphemous) is an infidel, whether he is called a Shia or something else. For example, a person who believes in the distortion of the Qur’an or denies the chastity of Sayyidah A’isha Siddiqa radiyallahu ‘anha or believes in the belief in Imamate (which is the denial of the finality of the Prophethood), is unanimously a disbeliever, no matter who he is. Since the above-mentioned blasphemous beliefs are present in the foundational books of the Shia and the Shias acknowledge them, all the scholar...

  Over the last few weeks, the Shia lovers, Shia sympathisers, and the unity crowd have been peddling deceptive propaganda and lies about the Shia disbelievers. The claim they make is: whatever is found in the Shia books is all old stuff, and the new and young Shia do not believe all these things anymore. Let us study this claim and see how much weight it really holds. Firstly, have these claims come from the highest Shia authorities in Iran, Iraq, and elsewhere? Or are these claims being peddled by local Shia lovers and Shia defenders for some ulterior motive, to guard something sinister? Secondly,  can the so-called new and young Shias urgently explain what is so new about themselves? Have they abandoned the 'Aqeedah of their forefathers? Then why do they still call themselves Shias or Twelvers? Thirdly, in what exactly are the so-called new and young Shias different from the old ones? If they have changed their 'Aqeedah for the better, i.e., they have embraced Islam, then t...

  The Saba'is, i.e., followers of 'Abdullah bin Saba are responsible for the horrible incident in Karbala.  The first strong proof to show this is the testimony of the Ahl-ul-Bayt who were present there. Or, those who were not present there, but because they are Ahl-ul-Bayt. Alternatively, they were living at the time when the incident happened, and they were fully aware of the background and finer details of the incident.  The second proof is the confession of the Saba'is of that time. There are many confessions from them available to study. See Badr-ul-Layali. However, regret upon regret, there are some amongst the Ahl-us-Sunnah wal Jama'ah that narrate the story of Karbala - they do not accept and believe the testimony of the Ahl-ul-Bayt, nor do they feel that the evidence of the Khayr-ul-Quroon is worthy of any attention. They pay no attention to the confession of the criminals themselves, all the while wearing the noose of following the elegiac Rafidi Abu Mikhnaf L...

Alhamdulillah, by the grace of Allah Ta'ala, Maktabah Al-Imam Al-Ghazali's new book is now available for free download! This work, 'Ilm-ul-'Aqidah wal Kalam Made Easy , has been prepared for students, teachers, Imams, Khatibs, and all those involved in learning and teaching the subject of 'Aqidah. In this day and age of fitan and attacks upon the fundamentals of Islam, aimed at wiping Islam off the earth and subverting the true and genuine creed of the Ahl-us-Sunnah wal Jama'ah, this book will, in-sha' Allah, help in propagating the truth.  This book traces the source of the subject of 'Aqidah and Kalaam from Imam Abu Hanifah rahimahullah, coming down. It lists the terminology used in the study of the classical 'Aqidah works, provides an overview of the abrogated religions and deviated sects, and encourages all Muslims to study and adhere to the creed of the Ahl-us-Sunnah wal Jama'ah. The book includes the English translation of the text of '...

  Afghanistan - The Graveyard of Superpowers by Moulana Afzal Ismail  Published by: Muslims at Work Publications, South Africa First Edition: Jumad al-Akhirah 1447 | December 2025 For generations, Afghanistan has been the land where empires invade - and fall. From colonial ambitions and Cold War invasions to modern warfare, the world's mightiest forces have entered its mountains with confidence and departed in defeat. Afghanistan - The Graveyard of Superpowers traces this remarkable pattern through history, analysing the British invasions, the Soviet occupation, the American-led war and the rise of the Taliban. It explores the imani, strategic and cultural forces that shaped Afghan resilience, the media narratives that distorted realities and the lessons the Noble Qur'an offers for understanding conflict. This book reveals why Afghanistan remains unconquered - and why its enemies fear its mujahideen.     〰 〰 〰 〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰 This is a brilliant work by the hard worki...

Mūṣā Aṣ-Ṣadr – Founder of Ḥarakah Amal Ash-Shia The Founder of Ḥarakah Amal Ash-Shia was Mūsā Aṣ-Ṣadr. He was a resident of Iran. He was born in 1928. He studied at Tehran University. Mūsā Aṣ-Ṣadr was the special student of Khomeini [la’anahullāh]. Family of Khomeini Mūsā Aṣ-Ṣadr had a close family relationship with Khomeini [la’anahullāh] too. The son of Khomeini - Aḥmad – was married to the niece of Mūsā Aṣ-Ṣadr. The nephew of Mūsā Aṣ-Ṣadr - Murtaḍā Aṭ-Ṭabāṭabā’ī – was married to the granddaughter of Khomeini [la’anahullāh]. Founding Ḥarakah Amal Ash-Shia Mūsā Aṣ-Ṣadr laid the foundations of Ḥarakah Amal Ash-Shia the Al-Junūb area of Lebanon. This organization was linked to the National Army. Mūsā Aṣ-Ṣadr made the Nuṣayrī Shia into his confidants, and placed them in important positions. Oppression upon the Palestinians Mūsā Aṣ-Ṣadr inflicted great oppression upon the Palestinians. The leaders of the Palestinian Freedom Movement were so distressed that they went to Egypt and delivered...

  Before the Safavid Takeover Before the Safavid takeover of Iran, the country was a flourishing Sunni Muslim state. It produced a large number of the greatest scholars and luminaries in Islamic history. Shah Ismail Safavi  In 1501 CE, Shah Ismail Safavi declared Shiasm (Twelver) as the state religion. Some of his courtiers told him that the large Sunni Muslim population that lived around them could rebel against him. Shah Ismail Safavi replied, "I have been deputed by Allah for this task. If anyone raises a voice against my decision, I will not leave him alive." Shah Ismail Safavi announced that the Khulafa' Ar-Rashidin, i.e., Sayyiduna Abu Bakr, Sayyiduna 'Umar, Sayyiduna 'Uthman radiyallahu 'anhum, should be sworn at openly. Whoever heard the swearing was to say in reply, "swear more and more." Moreover, he said, "Whoever opposes this instruction will be beheaded." He changed the Adhan and gave prominence to self-flagellation, and mourni...

  A great Mujahid and a magnificent leader, Ismail Haniyeh rahimahullah was barbarically martyred in Iran in July 2024.  Iran outwardly makes a display of support for Hamas and the cause of Palestine. But is this really the case? From the outset, it must be clear that Iran, a majority Twelver Shia country, has nothing to do with Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa, nor do the Shia believe it to be of any significance.  Ismail Haniyeh was living in Doha, and he would travel to other countries too. He went to Turkiye, Russia, Egypt etc. But when he went to Iran, it was a totally different puzzle.   When a noted leader is martyred, then every minute detail is flashed all over the media. Where was the person located? Who was he with? What had happened? How did he lose his life?  The media went into a frenzy when other world leaders were killed, but here? It was said that Ismail Haniyeh rahimahullah was martyred by a guided missile. It stands to reason that if a missile hits a bu...

Shiasm is, in essence, built upon abuse and revilement; if cursing, condemnation, and vilification were removed from it, nothing substantial would remain. Under the name of tabarra (disavowal), this ill-fated sect engages in endless foul speech, and every major and minor Shi‘i book contains these things in great detail. Some people are acting shocked by the ranting of the Kuwaiti cleric Yasser al-Khabith, whereas in reality there is nothing surprising about it. The vulgarities he spews are not even a fraction of the disbelief and absurdities found in Shi‘i literature itself. The disagreement between people like Yasser al-Khabith and Hassan Allahyari and many within their own sect is precisely over this: how long should silence under the guise of taqiyyah (dissimulation) continue? If this is how we are described in the books, why hesitate to present it openly before people? And once they are free from the “expediency” of concealing their religion, you can clearly see how the true face o...